London Stock Exchange Group is Using Blockchain to Record Unlisted Securities
A subsidiary of the London Stock Exchange Group is using blockchain to help unlisted small businesses tap resources previously only available to larger, public companies.
Developed by London Stock Exchange subsidiary Borsa Italiana, the blockchain platform, built with IBM Blockchain, is being designed to digitize both securities ownership and the capital structure of small- to medium-sized businesses (SMEs).
Currently undergoing an initial test phase with a small group of Borsa Italiana clients, the platform, powered by Hyperledger Fabric 1.0, is expected to eventually simplify the issuance of shares, streamlining SME access to capital.
London Stock Exchange Group's head of commercial technology innovation, David Harris, explained how moving the entire record of a small business's capital structure to a blockchain could make it easier for corporate owners to gain the trust of future investors.
Harris told CoinDesk:
"Once you offer this structure to allow the ownership to be registered on a blockchain, you're then opening up greater certainty as to the ownership structure, which adds to the transparency and certainty of what future investors in the company will be walking into."
Currently limited to SMEs in Europe, the blockchain solution is designed to replace the paper trading certificates still in use by many private companies with smaller budgets.
At this initial phase, only the records themselves are being moved to a blockchain, meaning Harris doesn't expect the increased efficiency will result in more frequent trades and higher liquidity.
However, Harris said the current tests are just the first of what he imagines could lead to the simplification of the fundraising process itself.
"As you build out this ecosystem, it does not take a giant leap to where future shareholders, future capital, future debt can be raised," said Harris.
Still, today's news also marks the first major public blockchain development for the London Stock Exchange Groups since it became a founding member of the then-unnamed Hyperledger project in late 2015.
After making early contributions to the code that eventually became known as Hyperledger Fabric, the London Stock Exchange Group has been relatively quiet.
According to Harris, the group, which also includes the Turquoise stock exchange and the FTSE AIM Italia SME index, remained skeptical that blockchain was mature enough to meet the company's regulatory demands and transaction requirements.
In addition, Harris said there is also the difficulty of converting traditional assets and workflows into blockchain assets and smart contracts.
Then, with the release of Hyperledger Fabric 0.6 earlier this year, LSEG set up an internal working group that united its business, regulatory and legal teams as part of an effort "to figure out the right places" to apply the technology.
The final decision to focus on private small business shares puts the group in a similar category to Nasdaq, which unveiled its own private securities platform using Chain earlier this year.
"With new companies, small- and medium-sized enterprises, who are not part yet of the public issuance process, they are a good starting point to introduce new types of models," said Harris.
While the project began with Fabric 0.6, the version currently being tested was recently upgraded to the newly released production-ready Fabric 1.0, according to IBM’s vice president of blockchain solutions and research, Ramesh Gopinath.
Gopinath reported that even after the upgrade, what remained to be satisfied from a regulatory perspective was the security of the data being supplied throughout the "lifecycle." This included all the events a small company undergoes, from its entrance to the blockchain ecosystem, through to its possible exit as a publicly traded company.
By "weaving" data provided by the still-unnamed test firms together with corporate actions programmed into smart contracts, "the right levels of trust in the data and the workflow itself" can potentially be achieved, he said.
A time frame for when the results of the tests will be published was not revealed.
"It's a technology that once it's widely adopted – and it has a long way to go – it is a disruptive innovation to its core, which is very exciting."
As Bitcoin and Ethereum gain popularity among investors, an increasing number of users are creating cryptocurrency wallets.
The wallets are either hosted through an online provider or stored on the user’s hardware.
From these wallets, cryptocurrency owners can make transactions on a blockchain, interact with exchanges and other users, and in the case of the Ethereum blockchain, programme autonomous contracts.
Sending cryptocurrency through the blockchain is quick and easy, but using cryptocurrency in lieu of fiat currency is still limited.
South African stores and services are slower to adopt cryptocurrencies than more developed countries, but users can still buy products locally with Bitcoin or Ethereum.
There is a growing list of stores in South Africa which accept Bitcoin as a payment option – many of which offer the option by allowing users to pay with PayFast.
PayFast has partnered with South African Bitcoin exchange Luno to provide users with a way to pay for products or…
I have been a buyer and holder of bitcoin and Etherreum for a long time but this will be the first ICO I buy into--Duncan Logan.
What is Electroneum?
Electroneum (ETN) is a cryptocurrency that can be mined with a smartphone, requiring almost no technical knowledge or prior experience. This sets it apart from other cryptocurrencies (like Bitcoin) which require expensive hardware and technical know-how to mine.
Electroneum’s unique mobile mining experience allows anyone with a smartphone to earn ETN coins by letting the miner app run in the background.
It was designed specifically with mobile users in mind, thereby appealing to a potential market of 2.2 billion smartphone users around the world. Unlike other cryptocurrencies, Electroneum has a user-friendly, beginner-oriented interface that allows users to seamlessly transfer ETN coins between one another, check their balances, and mine coins.
Being a cryptocurrency, Electroneum is created, held, and spent electronically, and has no phy…
Image Source: Photobucket
At their best, scientists represent the best in humanity: intelligence, curiosity, and skeptical rigor. This allows scientists to do things that ordinary people wouldn’t be allowed to get away with. If a random person burst into your house with a bubbling test tube and shouted “Quick! Drink this!” you’d call the police. Put that person in a white lab coat, though, and you’ll only delay long enough to thank them for coming in the nick of time.
Scientists are human, however, and humans who’ve been given that level of trust sometimes prove to be the last people in the world who should be trusted.
From the the Nazis to America’s own horrific misdeeds, here are four of the most evil science experiments ever carried out. Warning: This article contains details of experiments carried out with varying degrees of consent. If this is the sort of thing that upsets you, congratulations on not being a monster.
Evil Science Experiments: The Nazis
Nazi doctors tried to light…