Skip to main content

Case-By-Case or Cease-and-Desist? In Search Of a New Approach to ICOs

That rumble you hear is the sound of regulators around the world mobilizing resources to tackle the pressing matter of token sales.
Yet, in spite of the spectacular growth of blockchain token-based funding, no one seems to have a clear idea of what type of rules to introduce. The resulting uncertainty (not to mention ridicule) is left hindering progress as money flows to unviable projects and investors are left vulnerable to foul play – exactly what regulation is supposed to prevent.
Perhaps a new approach is needed.
But to see where this could go, it's worth stepping back and asking what we expect the regulation to do.

Safety belt

First, why do we need regulation, not just of finance, but of anything at all?
To protect us. At its roots, that is the main role of government – to protect its citizens from avoidable harm and extreme loss brought about by others or from our own lack of common sense. When it comes to securities, that usually means stopping us from making poor decisions.
After all, the word "security" means "safety," from the latin securus, or "free from care." Obviously, with time, the original intent of financial securities got buried in market myth, and the promise of high returns changed the connotation, implying risk.
As markets got more complex, instruments emerged that creatively skirted around the rules, which fostered innovation but also fragility, as we saw in 2008. Many argue that stronger oversight and tighter limitations could have prevented the crash – but at the time, innovation seemed like the better option.
This is especially relevant now that digital token sales have entered the picture.
Second, given the risk inherent in ideas with no working model, barely any documentation and doubtful liquidity, should the state intervene to "protect" us from token sales? The concern is that heavy-handed controlwould quash the fascinating progress going on in the space.
However, a wait-and-see approach is perhaps not doing enough to prevent extreme loss.
In applying a blanket rule with few specifics, the SEC seems to be taking a hybrid approach. In addition to its previous admonitory statements, this past week it announced not one but two new task forces to strengthen its footprint in token activity and investor protection.
While this is no doubt designed to both reassure and warn the market, it is still lacking in concrete guidance, requires case-by-case analysis and relies on post-hoc measures.

Checklist

A more solid and less resource-intensive solution could be to focus more on prevention than penalties.
This could be done by making it harder to sell newly issued tokens, regardless of structure, through disclosure and due diligence conditions.
Similar to the filing requirements for an IPO, tighter pre-sale rules could confirm that participants see the relevant documentation, while analysts have greater access to pertinent information and regulated alternative exchanges – such as the one revealed by tØ earlier this week – have time to ensure a minimum level of liquidity.
Establishing disclosure requirements would also streamline the regulators' workflow, and set clear guidelines for new ideas without eliminating either risk or creativity. What's more, it would impose a discipline on issuers, while leaving the ultimate decision on whether or not to participate to better-informed investors.
While passing through hurdles to get authorization does not necessarily mean that an issue is a good value or even honorable, it could serve to filter the flow and mitigate some of the risk.
And, obviously, not everyone thinks that regulation in financial instruments is a good idea – or even that it's possible.
But for buyers that want protection and issuers that want respectability, official support can open up new areas of opportunity and growth.

Changing lanes

The SEC has already shown its willingness to forgo full-IPO levels of disclosure, with its Regulation A+exemptions. A different category could be introduced for blockchain tokens that harness some of the advantages of this new distribution mechanism while ensuring a certain level of probity.
It would mean higher issuance costs than the current situation, which will push some contenders out of the market. However, projects with solid prospects and decent fundamentals should be able to cover those costs, either through existing revenues or through the intervention of angel and venture capital investors.
This type of collaboration could perhaps put a welcome end to the talk of ICOs "replacing" traditional financing methods, and encourage more stable, hybrid approaches.
It would also help bypass the prickly need to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a token is a security or a "utility coin." It wouldn't matter – ideally, they would all be a bit of both.
As well as simplifying the regulation of the sector – giving it a solid base from which to innovate while offering a certain level of comfort and upside to buyers – this approach would help shift us from the set mindset that new concepts can be defined by old categories. That alone could be enough to unleash another wave of creativity, giving rise to new functions, ecosystem and terminologies.
Who knows, perhaps we could come up with a better word to describe this new paradigm-changing concept, more in line with its potential. And "security" could go back to meaning something secure.
And "security" could go back to meaning something secure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Blockchain Could Help Tech Giant Cisco Reboot

Cisco is changing. The technology firm best known as the supplier of enterprise computer hardware has seen a slow, steady decline in revenue from some of its core products. As a result of an increasing number technological services being virtualized, and the storage of information moving to the cloud, the $158bn firm has been  restructuring  and exploring new ways to capitalize on connected devices. But amidst this change in identity, it's in identity itself where some of the California-based company's most interesting new experiments are taking place. With a series of early stage blockchain  projects , Cisco is now pushing even deeper into what could end up being much more than a way for employees to prove who they are across subsidiaries. In conversation with CoinDesk, Robert Greenfield IV, Cisco software engineer and executive team lead of the firm's Connected Black Professionals resource group, explained how several blockchain projects have evolv...

Bitcoin in Africa: Insights from the Continent’s Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

Isn’t it absurd that nearly 326 million people representing 80% of the adult population in Africa do not have access to bank accounts? This wretched situation denies countless of people financial freedom in the so-called dark continent. Bureaucratic tenors and economic exclusion inter alia have paved the way for the current phenomenon. Last year a study of 10 African nations with unusual inflationary ratio had South Sudan registering an unimaginable inflation rate of 295 percent. Egypt had the slightest with 12.30 percent. African governments continue to plunder the riches of the African people through Inflation. This makes it considerably insurmountable for individuals to conserve their resources. Moreover, public sector borrowing has crowded out the efficient private sector that can put credit to good use. The IMF estimates that averagely credit to the private sector is estimated at 30 percent of GDP in Sub-Sahara Africa. CCN spoke to Werner van Rooyen, Head of Business Develo...

WANT TO BUY BITCOIN IN SOUTH AFRICA , KENYA, UGANDA, NIGERIA, GHANA OR OTHER COUNTRIES IN AFRICA? SIMPLE.

With the growing awareness around Africa of bitcoin as a crypto-currency, a means of remittance and a creator of  wealth, more and more people in more and more countries are looking to buy it, and asking how and where they can buy it. Purchasing bitcoin is simple. Simply go online and do a search for “Buying and selling bitcoin in South Africa ““Buying and selling bitcoin in Kenya “Buying and selling bitcoin in Uganda ““Buying and selling bitcoin in Nigeria “ or  “Buying and selling bitcoin in Ghana“ – you get the idea.   To help you though:   In South Africa, three of the most common (and trusted) platforms are: www.localbitcoins.com www.luno.com www.bitx.co In Kenya, the most common (and trusted) platforms) are: www.localbitcoins.com www.bitpesa.co whilst other platforms include: www.altcoins.io www.99bitcoins.com In Uganda, the most common (and trusted) platforms) are: www.localbitcoins.com www.bitpesa.co whilst other platforms incl...